Since it was created back in 1997, Carsurvey.org has organised reviews by the year of manufacture of the cars. This made sense for European cars, but not for North American cars, where model year is what matters. The site eventually started collecting model year information, but the site structure did not change, as it was difficult to come up with a consistent structure that would make sense on both sides of the Atlantic.
I’ve been aware for years that North American visitors were confused by the site structure, and I eventually came to the conclusion that it was better for the meaning of a year on Carsurvey.org to be inconsistent, depending on the region of the review.
For a North American review, the model year (where available) is used in preference to the year of manufacture. This isn’t the case for the rest of the world.
So a list of 2006 BMW 3 Series reviews will contain 2006 model year reviews from North America, and 2006 manufacture year reviews from elsewhere. Not quite the same thing, but for reviews from their own region, it should fit visitor’s assumptions, rather than trying to make them fit the site’s data model.
MotorcycleSurvey.com has also had similar changes made, but in that case, model year always takes priority over year of manufacture, regardless of region, as that reflects the way motorcycles are marketed.
I think this is quite appropriate, I know in the UK no one cares about a model year, they want to know the registration year and when it was built, and when new models come out it can be confusing for a non-native.
If you went by “model year” as some car companies do, my ’76 Gran Torino, built in 7/76, would be a ’77 model. By manufacturing year, my wife’s 9/99 manufactured ’00 Durango would be a 1999 model.
Sometimes inconsistency is the best policy. Or is that honesty? Eh, make it both, too!
Thanks for the feedback Alan.
So far no one has complained about the change, so hopefully it was the right decision.